Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Virginia ready to roll with projects as Biden prepares to sign $1 trillion infrastructure bill
editor's pick

Virginia ready to roll with projects as Biden prepares to sign $1 trillion infrastructure bill

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}

Sen. Mark Warner: Here's what the infrastructure bill means for Virginia

Aubrey Layne had spent the past 7 ½ years helping Virginia prepare for the kinds of investments the federal government is poised to make in a $1 trillion public infrastructure bill that President Joe Biden will sign on Monday.

Layne was transportation secretary and then finance secretary under two Democratic governors, but now he’s advising an incoming Republican governor, Glenn Youngkin, on how to best take advantage of the opportunity offered to Virginia by massive investments in the public infrastructure that supports the economy.

He says the state has programs in place to put the money to work, especially in transportation projects such as roads and bridges, passenger rail and public transit, airports and the Port of Virginia.

“I think the governor is going to be handed a pretty good road map he can look at,” said Layne, now senior vice president at Sentara Healthcare and a member of the transition team that Youngkin named to prepare him to take office in January.

The infrastructure package, which Congress adopted more than a week ago after months of haggling among Democrats over a separate $1.75 trillion spending bill, passed with significant bipartisan support in the Senate in August.

It received crucial votes from 13 Republicans in the House of Representatives to make the biggest investment in the nation’s infrastructure in more than a generation.

Youngkin’s view

In Quantico on Wednesday, Youngkin attended a ceremony marking the 246th birthday of the Marine Corps. There, he addressed the infrastructure package for the first time since his election.

“Mine’s far less of a good or bad political decision,” he said of his position on the bill. “There’s going to be good support for Virginia that comes out of that bill, and right now we’re trying to make sure we identify where the support for Virginia can come.”

Youngkin said Virginia has many infrastructure needs, from broadband access to making sure roads and bridges are reinforced and maintained, to building connections to the “leading capabilities” of the Port of Virginia, which he called “one of the great natural wonders in the world.”

“I’m really focused on making sure Virginia gets moving, and I think the infrastructure bill will help us,” he said.

Biden introduces national port plan of action in Baltimore

Transportation

The package includes $7 billion for transportation projects in Virginia — most of it existing federal commitments reauthorized under the bill, but also more than $1.5 billion on new transportation projects.

About one-third of that will flow through the funding programs that Virginia set up in 2015 to allocate money raised through a $6 billion state transportation package two years earlier; one-third will provide new money to repair and replace roads and bridges over the next five years; and another third will go into programs to reduce carbon pollution contributing to global warming and protecting road networks against flooding from sea-level rise.

“It’s obviously a substantial amount of money. ... This will almost certainly allow the state to bring forward some big projects and fund those sooner than it would have,” Justin Brown, senior associate director at the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, told state legislators before a positive staff report about Virginia’s transportation infrastructure program.

The private companies that build roads and bridges or supply materials for concrete and asphalt say they are ready, with a workforce that never stopped during the pandemic, but know it will take time for the money to flow through the system.

“The full impact won’t be felt until 2025,” said Gordon Dixon, executive vice president of the Virginia Transportation Construction Alliance, representing more than 300 member companies. “There is this expectation that all this money from Washington, D.C., is going to be flooding into Virginia. It’s not going to happen that fast.”

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., was a leader of a bipartisan group of 10 senators who fashioned the framework for the legislation last spring and summer, with help from Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, and the Problem Solvers Coalition in the House.

“This legislation isn’t just about paving crumbling roads, replacing toxic water pipes, expanding high speed internet, or revamping transportation systems — this is about putting our nation on the fast track to economic prosperity,” Warner said in a statement on Friday.

Spanberger said, “It’s money for Virginia, just across the board.”

The infrastructure package will provide at least $100 million for accelerating the state effort to achieve universal broadband access in all parts of Virginia, closing a yawning gap for high-speed internet service that proved critical to work and study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

It will provide $1.2 billion to improve public transportation in Virginia by modernizing bus and rail fleets. It includes big investments in passenger rail, including $22 billion in grants to Amtrak that will be used, in part, to expand passenger rail service between Washington, D.C., and Richmond, as well as Hampton Roads and western Virginia.

Virginia airports will receive an estimated $386 million over five years to make improvements in their infrastructure, such as runways and terminals. The Port of Virginia, including the terminal on the James River in Richmond, will be eligible for funding through $17 billion in grants nationally.

Replacing water pipes

The state expects to receive $378 million over five years to replace lead water pipes and other drinking water systems, said Rep. Donald McEachin, D-4th, who sees that investment as vital to public health, particularly for children in underserved communities.

“We need to replace those pipes,” McEachin said Friday. “We need to bring them up to 21st-century standards.”

The package also includes $1 billion for grants to communities to address old wrongs from transportation projects built through minority communities — such as construction of what became Interstate 95 through Jackson Ward in downtown Richmond.

The bill is expected to provide at least $106 million over the next five years to install electric vehicle charging stations in Virginia, and include funding to replace school buses to reduce the pollution they emit. It contains money to clean up hazardous waste sites, make the electric power grid more secure and reliable and to guard against cyberattacks.

The consequences of climate change are addressed through investments in transportation, but also to prevent wildfires, protect against flooding and protect ecosystems in and around the Chesapeake Bay.

“When you talk about flooding, it’s not just along the coast of Virginia, it’s not just storm surge,” Secretary of Transportation Shannon Valentine told legislators on JLARC this month. “It really is affecting flooding across the entire commonwealth.”

Highways

The four Republicans in Virginia’s congressional delegation voted against the bill in the House, but Rep. Rob Wittman, R-1st, said he strongly supports investments in roads, bridges, passenger rail, broadband and other pillars of the package.

Wittman, whose district includes Hanover and New Kent counties in the Richmond area, is particularly focused on critical highway improvements, such as widening Interstate 64 east of Richmond between New Kent and James City counties and easing traffic congestion at bottlenecks along I-95 between Richmond and Washington.

He contends that most of the $550 billion in new spending in the bill won’t go to traditional forms of infrastructure, but instead to what he called priorities of the Green New Deal that progressive Democrats advocate to combat climate change and protect the environment.

He’s also concerned that the bill gives too much discretion to U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg to determine how to allocate money that will go through new competitive grant programs.

“Virginia is ready,” Wittman agreed. “The only unknown is what are the requirements going to be at the federal level getting the money awarded to Virginia.”

“My hope is the money gets here as fast as they can and directly to state governments because the commonwealth is in the best position to make those decisions,” he said.

Programs in place

State officials say programs already are in place to handle much of the funding, whether for transportation or drinking water.

“To the extent we have existing programs where the dollars can flow through, I would expect we’d do that,” Secretary of Finance Joe Flores said Friday. “There’s no need to reinvent the wheel.”

Layne helped create some of those programs when he was secretary of transportation under then-Gov. Terry McAuliffe, working with Republicans who then controlled the General Assembly. Programs such as Smart Scale allow the state to rank transportation by quantifiable measures, such as traffic congestion and safety, to determine where to spend limited funds.

“I don’t think it’s going to be the political process here that it is in other states,” he said.

In its report this month, JLARC staff said, “Virginia uses an effective process to identify needed improvements to the transportation system.”

Senate Finance and Appropriations Chair Janet Howell, D-Fairfax, said that didn’t just happen.

Last year, legislators adopted an omnibus transportation bill that raised state and regional gasoline taxes — including one Youngkin wants to partly roll back — created a passenger rail authority and set the stage for a new way of funding projects as reliance on vehicle fuel taxes wanes.

“A number of us took very difficult votes in order to get the funding to do many of those projects you talk about,” Howell said, “and I hope nothing happens over the next few years to set us back.”

Layne said the infrastructure package could help Youngkin fulfill his campaign pledge to temporarily suspend collection of a 5-cent-per-gallon gas tax that took effect July 1. The temporary rollback would cost the state an estimated $200 million, but he said the additional federal aid could offset the cost without hurting pending projects.

“I don’t think there are many projects out there that would have to be stalled,” he said.

On the other hand, Layne said, the new governor would have to get General Assembly support to suspend a portion of the state gas tax, which, at 26.2 cents per gallon, is about 10 cents per gallon lower than in neighboring North Carolina.

“It may not show up at the pump,” he said.

Joe McAndrew, transportation expert at the corporate-led Greater Washington Partnership, said Layne and Valentine had “done an amazing amount of work and it’s been bipartisan every step of the way.”

“We have every reason to believe that is going to continue going forward,” McAndrew said.

"A once-in-a-generation investment that's going to create millions of jobs, modernizing our infrastructure, our roads, our bridges, our broadband, all range of things," said President Joe Biden.The recently passed bipartisan infrastructure bill will invest $1.2 trillion across the country over the next five years. So how far can that money go to help projects that have been neglected for decades? Roads and bridges are quintessential elements of infrastructure, and the bill provides $110 billion to repair, replace and improve them."This is the largest investment in roads, bridges and highways since the creation of the interstate highway system, including the largest investment in our bridges ever so that we can avoid devastating closures and disruptive collapses, including what we saw in Tennessee and Florida and far too many other places," said Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. But that $110 billion is only a fraction of the estimated $786 billion backlog of needed repairs, expansions and safety improvements. Another area getting much less money than needed: replacing lead pipes. For example, experts say it will cost between $45 billion and $65 billion to replace all the nation's lead pipes. But the bill only sets aside $15 billion for that effort. "There's an additional about $23.5 billion that's divided equally ... earmarked for general water infrastructure stuff, and there's nothing stopping some of that money to also go towards [lead water pipe replacement], which is what the White House has talked about, as well. So it's not just the $15 billion," said Scott Berry, the director of policy and government affairs with the U.S. Water Alliance. High-speed internet access is a newer infrastructure priority. The bipartisan deal sets aside $65 billion to expand access, also short of the $80 billion the Federal Communications Commission says it would cost to get 100% broadband coverage. And part of the plan is also focused on making the internet affordable.  "Everyone who gets a penny of this money is required to offer a low-cost, affordable plan; provide federal funding for broadband services to low-income families; requiring providers to be transparent about pricing to help families do comparison shopping, said Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.One area where the bill seems to deliver is on bridges. Over $36 billion will go specifically toward them. And according to The American Road and Transportation Builders Association, that's just shy of the estimated $42 billion needed to fix or replace every bridge rated as "poor" in the country. And every corner of the country is set to benefit from the wide-ranging improvements that include $17 billion for the nation's ports and waterways; $25 billion for airport terminals, gates and runways; nearly $90 billion for public transit like buses and subways; $66 billion for passenger trains (the largest investment since the creation of Amtrak); and $7.5 billion for a new network of electric vehicle charging stations.  President Biden said Americans will start seeing the real impact of this bill in just two to three months, but turning all this new federal funding into completed projects will take time.  "But I also think it's important to be realistic, and you have to be honest with people, which is to say we want to get this right. You know, it's more important to get it right than to rush. So, I think people will see their state putting together a plan. They'll see us starting to move out on that plan. But, you know, not everybody is going to have broadband a year from now," said Raimondo.  

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

Dr. William A. Petri, an immunologist at the University of Virginia School of Medicine, answers this week’s questions from readers on COVID-19. Dr. Petri will keep dishing on COVID-19 and answering your questions each week in The Daily Progress for as long as you have questions. Send them to Editor Lynne Anderson at: vanderson@dailyprogress.com, and she will forward them to Dr. Petri.

Recommended for you

Welcome to the Conversation

No name-calling, personal insults or threats. No attacks based on race, gender, ethnicity, etc. No writing with your caps lock on – it's screaming. Keep on topic and under 1,500 characters. No profanity or vulgarity. Stay G- or PG-rated.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

Breaking News

News Alerts